LogFAQs > #891448641

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts passed
COVxy 12/02/17 10:15:23 AM #149:	The Admiral posted... COVxy posted... What I'm saying is that the rich getting richer is necessarily endemic to an unregulated system in which the probability of obtaining wealth is dependent on current wealth. What regulations are you talking about? Or are you just using that as code for "taxes?" The regulation, within the scope of this discussion, is irrelevant. Any regulation which fucks with the dependence of wealth gain on current weath counts. The main point is that the argument that to produce more equality we need less regulation is complete and utter bullshit, and if anyone ever thought about it for half a second they would realize that. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:891448641] in Tax Cuts a... [t:76053052]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>What I'm saying is that the rich getting richer is necessarily endemic to an unregulated system in which the probability of obtaining wealth is dependent on current wealth.</quote> What regulations are you talking about? Or are you just using that as code for "taxes?"</quote> The regulation, within the scope of this discussion, is irrelevant. Any regulation which fucks with the dependence of wealth gain on current weath counts. The main point is that the argument that to produce more equality we need less regulation is complete and utter bullshit, and if anyone ever thought about it for half a second they would realize that. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1