LogFAQs > #891326510

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of Maryland.
KogaSteelfang 11/30/17 9:58:16 AM #43:	DawkinsNumber4 posted... KogaSteelfang posted... You know you're only in legal trouble because you were the one violating people's civil rights, correct? Criminals and people on trial do have their rights suspended/restricted, in order to protect the people around them. That's simply how the justice system works, filing an appeal based on you having your rights violated by the law, while on trial for violating the rights of others is dumb, and won't hold water at all. If you truly felt people's rights are that important, there'd be no reasonable excuse for the actions that you got you in trouble to begin with. This just reeks of someone not wanting to take responsibility of their own choices and hoping that someone in the system is dumb enough to fall for some legalese mumbo jumbo. Considering you don't understand that in America we have a "presumption of innocence" you don't have any actual credibility to your beliefs. Innocent until proven guilty, which you did yourself with the recordings, which were also violations of the other people's rights. You proved yourself guilty simply by commiting the act itself. Then you were directly ordered to stop, which you did not, and have been making your violations public ever since. Citing your rights being infringed upon, after you disregarded the rights of those around you, the law, and a court order won't hold up. --- What did the pirate say on his 80th birthday? Aye Matey! <cite>KogaSteelfang posted [p:891326510] in I filed a ... [t:76046281]...</cite> <quote><cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KogaSteelfang posted...</cite> <quote>You know you're only in legal trouble because you were the one violating people's civil rights, correct? Criminals and people on trial do have their rights suspended/restricted, in order to protect the people around them. That's simply how the justice system works, filing an appeal based on you having your rights violated by the law, while on trial for violating the rights of others is dumb, and won't hold water at all. If you truly felt people's rights are that important, there'd be no reasonable excuse for the actions that you got you in trouble to begin with. This just reeks of someone not wanting to take responsibility of their own choices and hoping that someone in the system is dumb enough to fall for some legalese mumbo jumbo.</quote> Considering you don't understand that in America we have a "presumption of innocence" you don't have any actual credibility to your beliefs.</quote> Innocent until proven guilty, which you did yourself with the recordings, which were also violations of the other people's rights. You proved yourself guilty simply by commiting the act itself. Then you were directly ordered to stop, which you did not, and have been making your violations public ever since. Citing your rights being infringed upon, after you disregarded the rights of those around you, the law, and a court order won't hold up. --- What did the pirate say on his 80th birthday? Aye Matey!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1