LogFAQs > #891171567

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicReading about a police officer trying to get suppressors allowed in department.
OctilIery
11/27/17 8:56:15 PM
#20:


BalisticWarri0r posted...
Kirby posted...
We have suppressors on our in-car rifles. Personally I think its a waste; whenever we go to the range we always have ear protection on anyway. And if it ever came to a real life scenario where you had to use the rifle, adrenaline would be pumping and you wouldnt be affected by the noise. Might do some damage long term, but the majority of cops never fire their weapon anyway.

It also adds unnecessary weight, and once youre holding a rifle for 15 minutes straight...it starts to feel like a ton. So the less the better when it comes to rifles...at least in my opinion.

This is false.

And if the weight of a rifle feels like a ton after 15 minutes you should probably workout more.

No that last point is a valid comment that others have made.

Nomadic View posted...
Law enforcement use firearms so rarely I dont see a viable reason for it.

Because even as rarely as they use rifles, this will save tons in workers comp from hearing damage.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1