LogFAQs > #891142146

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe case for Hillary Clinton 2020
ChaoticKnuckles
11/27/17 12:19:34 PM
#84:


CarlGrimes posted...
ChaoticKnuckles posted...
Doesnt mean shes unqualified.

It kind of does. She was had no proof that she was the better choice. You can't believe a word that comes out of her mouth.


Youre mixing arguments. And you cherry picked my post. Her losing isnt proof one way or the other of how qualified she is to be President. It simply shows that fewer people liked her in the states that mattered. As I already said, you cant even really point to her being less popular because she won the popular vote, that just doesnt make you president in our current system.

Whether you think she was the better choice or not is a matter of personal opinion. But saying that her losing is proof she isnt qualified isnt accurate. Its not proof of anything of the sort, just like it isnt proof that Trump IS qualified simply because he won.
---
You look EXTREMELY immature when you announce that you're about to ignore someone. No one cares, including the person about to be ignored. Just FYI.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1