LogFAQs > #891063116

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The case for Hillary Clinton 2020
ChaoticKnuckles 11/25/17 11:58:51 PM #78:	nesplayer posted... ChaoticKnuckles posted... Personally no. She had her run at the presidency and lost. Has a party ever renominated someone who won the primary and then lost the general election? I feel like just from an optics standpoint that looks really bad. Perot, lost in 1992, lost again in 1996 I meant of the two major parties. He was a third party candidate right? I cant think of any time a Republican or Democrat won the primary, was their partys nominee, lost the general election and then came back and attempted to be the nominee again. --- You look EXTREMELY immature when you announce that you're about to ignore someone. No one cares, including the person about to be ignored. Just FYI. <cite>ChaoticKnuckles posted [p:891063116] in The case f... [t:76029427]...</cite> <quote><cite>nesplayer posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChaoticKnuckles posted...</cite> <quote>Personally no. She had her run at the presidency and lost. Has a party ever renominated someone who won the primary and then lost the general election? I feel like just from an optics standpoint that looks really bad.</quote> Perot, lost in 1992, lost again in 1996</quote> I meant of the two major parties. He was a third party candidate right? I cant think of any time a Republican or Democrat won the primary, was their partys nominee, lost the general election and then came back and attempted to be the nominee again. --- You look EXTREMELY immature when you announce that you're about to ignore someone. No one cares, including the person about to be ignored. Just FYI.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1