LogFAQs > #890992153

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Top Commander will DEFY Trump if he orders a NUKE Attack on North Korea!!!
mooreandrew58 11/24/17 4:36:18 PM #20:	Zeus posted... mooreandrew58 posted... considering a soviet soldier refused to follow orders and didn't nuke us at one time, I feel this guy has the moral right to say no. he may lose his job and be thrown in the brig, but sometimes thats worth knowing you did what you felt was right. That was a retaliatory strike. No safety is gained during a retaliatory strike, other than maybe stopping additional attacks down the road. However, if we learned hours in advance that NK had a long-range missile which it was going to destroy most of California then a nuclear strike could prevent massive American casualties... only for the launch to be blocked because General Dickweed has beef with the president and his personal grudge is more important than millions of American lives. actually no I talk about the cuban missile crisis.(pretty sure I heard about a dude during that ordered to launch one) I think you are referring to a time they had a glitch in their system and thought we where attacking them. (I don't think these two are the same incident, but I could be wrong. history class was over a decade ago) but a retaliatory strike would be just for proving a point. you attack us, we attack you. creating a deterrence. and that would literally be the only reason i'd agree with launching nukes if some where launched at us. the hope it would prevent anyone from having the balls to do it again should we survive. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:890992153] in Top Comman... [t:76006273]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mooreandrew58 posted...</cite> <quote>considering a soviet soldier refused to follow orders and didn't nuke us at one time, I feel this guy has the moral right to say no. he may lose his job and be thrown in the brig, but sometimes thats worth knowing you did what you felt was right.</quote> That was a retaliatory strike. No safety is gained during a retaliatory strike, other than maybe stopping additional attacks down the road. However, if we learned hours in advance that NK had a long-range missile which it was going to destroy most of California then a nuclear strike could prevent massive American casualties... only for the launch to be blocked because General Dickweed has beef with the president and his personal grudge is more important than millions of American lives.</quote> actually no I talk about the cuban missile crisis.(pretty sure I heard about a dude during that ordered to launch one) I think you are referring to a time they had a glitch in their system and thought we where attacking them. (I don't think these two are the same incident, but I could be wrong. history class was over a decade ago) but a retaliatory strike would be just for proving a point. you attack us, we attack you. creating a deterrence. and that would literally be the only reason i'd agree with launching nukes if some where launched at us. the hope it would prevent anyone from having the balls to do it again should we survive. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1