>implying there's no living expenses in the US >implying those people could get those same paying jobs they have in the US in Haiti as well >implying those same people working in the US aren't already sending money to their families who aren't able to find work and are living below the poverty line, likely already with the money they're getting from people in the US
So you think the nation wouldn't benefit from the return of these able-bodied individuals and whatever income they MAY have set aside? Aren't you a socialist? Because this sounds like a perfect case of "for the good of society". How many lives will be saved in the next 10 years by the influx of income and energy? Imagine what 60,000 people... let's say even 10,000 people could do towards repairing that infrastructure.
>implying there's no living expenses in the US >implying those same people working in the US aren't already sending money to their families who aren't able to find work and are living below the poverty line, likely already with the money they're getting from people in the US
So you think the nation wouldn't benefit from the return of these able-bodied individuals and whatever income they MAY have set aside?
If you can't answer the question just say so. No need to get stuck in a loop of "oh shit he has a point" nonsense.
"may have set aside"
>implying they have money set aside to take with them
Your premise is flawed and stupid and it's not even worth answering your shitty question because you have literally no point. ---
