LogFAQs > #890721509

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I've now officially seen every MCU movies spoilers
MabusIncarnate 11/20/17 12:17:32 AM #28:	KarmaMuffin posted... dave_is_slick posted... It was better than Thor 2, I don't remember shit from that atrocity. Yeah, Thor 2 was pretty bad. I don't think it's fair to compare any of the MCU to the Hulk though, it's too much of a tonal shift between them. If I had, then yeah it'd be at the bottom of my list. Cap 1 and Thor 1, ehhh. they're not bad but very basic compared to the post-Avengers movies. I don't like IM 2, but can see why someone would like it. AoU was pretty mediocre. Ant-Man was fun as hell though. GotG 2 I think isn't bad, it just feels like such a letdown from the first one that it's hard for me to be unbiased and judge it by itself instead of comparing it to the original. That's because the first one was truly a top-tier, rare film that comes along only once or twice a year. It really is a gem and pretty groundbreaking. I wouldn't expect it to be topped by any sequel, more or less anything else sci-fi in the next 5+ years. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:890721509] in I've now o... [t:76009827]...</cite> <quote><cite>KarmaMuffin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dave_is_slick posted...</cite> <quote>It was better than Thor 2, I don't remember shit from that atrocity. </quote> Yeah, Thor 2 was pretty bad. I don't think it's fair to compare any of the MCU to the Hulk though, it's too much of a tonal shift between them. If I had, then yeah it'd be at the bottom of my list. Cap 1 and Thor 1, ehhh. they're not bad but very basic compared to the post-Avengers movies. I don't like IM 2, but can see why someone would like it. AoU was pretty mediocre. Ant-Man was fun as hell though. GotG 2 I think isn't bad, it just feels like such a letdown from the first one that it's hard for me to be unbiased and judge it by itself instead of comparing it to the original.</quote> That's because the first one was truly a top-tier, rare film that comes along only once or twice a year. It really is a gem and pretty groundbreaking. I wouldn't expect it to be topped by any sequel, more or less anything else sci-fi in the next 5+ years. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1