LogFAQs > #890679812

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThor: Ragnarok was virtually perfect IMO. Did you have any criticisms?
WizardPowers
11/19/17 12:15:01 PM
#31:


Lorenzo_2003 posted...
WizardPowers posted...


And Hela only got to fight thor for like 2 minutes before getting insta killed. They hype her up the whole goddamn movie to literally kill her in one shot in like 10 seconds. Lame. Let her and powered up thor duke it out for at least like 5 minutes or something.


You're gotta be kidding. We already saw the shitshow fight scene that was Superman vs Zod in Man of Steel, and how it just kept going on and on and on and on. Thor Ragnarok mentioned several times that Thor can not defeat Hela, so it was smart of him to work as a team to take out her soldiers, save the Asgardians and manipulate OP Surtr into wrecking Hela. He even needed Loki's help to save the day, which showed he did love and rely on him after all they'd been through and it allowed Loki to also have his own characted arc of redemption. I'm glad they did it that way. The movie had the balls to go in a different direction and not have Thor be his usual dumb self, who only knows how to bash at things.


the fighting was the one thing people praised about MoS. And it was definately lame to reveal Thor's powers to only have him use it once and then immediately give up. They could have ended the movie exactly the same and I would have been happy. Just give a chance for Hela to actually prove she's as powerful as they were saying. All they had her do was beat up nameless, faceless jobbers. Like for real Thor vs Hulk got more screen time than Thor vs THE MAIN VILLAIN
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1