LogFAQs > #890636410

I just don't see what she has to lose by having a third party just prove it and shove it in his face real fast.

Raises the stakes. Suppose that the signature is genuine. Then Moore is already lying about it, and if a third party concludes that it's a genuine signature, Moore will simply accuse them of being part of the conspiracy against him. But if Congress has gotten formally involved? He'll make the same accusation, I'm sure... and in the process create a group of Senators of the "that jerk called me a liar, I want him out" bent.

Edit: I should also point out, Corrik, that people who do not believe the overwhelming majority of scientists about global warming are unlikely to believe some random 'handwriting expert' telling them things they don't want to believe.
---

I don't like this duchy. Now, it's an adventurer.