LogFAQs > #889951909

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Idea for gun control that doesn't actually infringe upon rights of good citizens
StucklnMyPants 11/07/17 5:20:25 PM #69:	@AlephZero posted... only cops should be allowed to have guns This isn't an argument, no matter how many times you repeat it. How do you get rid of guns already in circulation? Are you willing to shed American blood to take those guns? Do you think military personnel , who generally are pro-2nd amendment, would be willing to deploy on American soil and forcibly take citizens guns? Are you willing to have another Civil War to take those guns, because it would be a strong possibility that would happen? How effective do you think people who don't want anyone owning guns, versus people that do own guns, would be in that war? Can you explain exactly how disarming citizens, who already follow laws, makes them safer? --- Rage, rage against the dying of the light. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:889951909] in Idea for g... [t:75965884]...</cite> <quote><cite>@AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>only cops should be allowed to have guns</quote> This isn't an argument, no matter how many times you repeat it. How do you get rid of guns already in circulation? Are you willing to shed American blood to take those guns? Do you think military personnel , who generally are pro-2nd amendment, would be willing to deploy on American soil and forcibly take citizens guns? Are you willing to have another Civil War to take those guns, because it would be a strong possibility that would happen? How effective do you think people who don't want anyone owning guns, versus people that do own guns, would be in that war? Can you explain exactly how disarming citizens, who already follow laws, makes them safer? --- Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1