LogFAQs > #889521323

Jen0125 posted...

JunkoEnoshima posted...

what is the importance of the distinction here? i dont care if hes more accurately described as something else, the fact remains that he has sexually engaged with a 14 year old boy and it probably wasnt the only time he did so, either. hes a dude who makes moves on teen boys. that is the important thing. the fact that this board is splitting hairs about this is really telling

the importance of the distinction is calling a spade a spade. you shouldn't label someone a pedophile when they aren't because people have a severe disgust for pedophiles. people will literally murder pedophiles. if you mislabel someone a pedophile you could be doing them harm that isn't due for them. you should should care if he's more accurately described as something else especially if what you're describing him as is something that is extremely inflammatory.

is what he did very wrong? yes. but he's not a pedophile. he's a man that attempted sexual advances on a teenage boy and should be treated accordingly. he didn't attempt sexual advances on a small child which is what pedophiles do.

14 year old teenage boys and girls willingly engage in sexual acts all the time with teens their own age and people that are older.

young children don't willingly engage in sexual acts with 26 year old men and women. that's the difference.

thank you jen.

Zikten posted...

ephebophila I think it's called

yes this. i fucking hate the word because its hard to spell and even harder to say. but this is what he is. and as far as the rumors go it seems like young twinks are his go to. not CHILDREN. get it right people.