LogFAQs > #889444046

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Charges filed!!!! Arrest as soon as Monday!!!!
Doctor Foxx 10/30/17 4:06:32 PM #69:	Smarkil posted... It's barely even an observation. My point is that you didn't even bother to go to Fox to see if it was true or not. You instead chose to filter through an obviously biased 'news' entity and immediately thought "Well look at Fox being shitty". At the time the article was written it was accurate (see the screenshot of the two networks). it wasn't until the Fox & Friends segment ended that any network coverage began. Then the coverage was primarily based on "illegal leaks" of the indictment information, not on the actual indictments. By the time you checked to verify (the website, not the news network) it was hours later and yes at that point the coverage changed. Screenshots (with timestamps) abound observing the earlier lack of coverage on the network. Since neither of us can time travel and probably don;t have fox news on DVR that's the best we're going to do. Thankfully Fox news has since started reporting on this issue on their network. They were undeniably slow to start on it. --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:889444046] in Charges fi... [t:75928916]...</cite> <quote><cite>Smarkil posted...</cite> <quote>It's barely even an observation. My point is that you didn't even bother to go to Fox to see if it was true or not. You instead chose to filter through an obviously biased 'news' entity and immediately thought "Well look at Fox being shitty". </quote> At the time the article was written it was accurate (see the screenshot of the two networks). it wasn't until the Fox & Friends segment ended that any network coverage began. Then the coverage was primarily based on "illegal leaks" of the indictment information, not on the actual indictments. By the time you checked to verify (the website, not the news network) it was hours later and yes at that point the coverage changed. Screenshots (with timestamps) abound observing the earlier lack of coverage on the network. Since neither of us can time travel and probably don;t have fox news on DVR that's the best we're going to do. Thankfully Fox news has since started reporting on this issue on their network. They were undeniably slow to start on it. --- Never write off the Doctor!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1