LogFAQs > #888737618

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThor 2 is better than Thor 1 (spoilers)
hollow_shrine
10/19/17 2:19:18 PM
#8:


ChromaticAngel posted...
GOATTHlEF posted...
No.

Thor had giants, fun battles, a iron automaton that blasted things, the first real Avengers connection...etc. It wasn't the best, but Thor 2 was just absolute irredeemable junk.


RDJ in The Incredible Hulk was the first Avengers connection.

Action / Fighting scenes in Thor 2 were fantastic. They were stupid in Thor 1 and the giant iron automaton was stupid. They were the only good part of the movie as the plot was largely incoherent.

Thor 1 doesn't even have good action scenes, and then it's got Chris Hemsworth acting sadder than Henry Cavill in BvS. And the plot is even dumber than Thor 2.

I'd call Thor 1 the worst one in the entire franchise but Iron Man 3 still exists.

I've always disliked IM2 more than IM3, though neither one of them seemed terribly necessary. One of those should have been a Black Widow solo film (probably IM3, since she's not a breakout favorite until Avengers happens). The other one (IM2) needs to happen to introduce more of SHIELD, but needs a dramatically different...everything.
---
Newt Gingrich apparently published a novel named "Duplicity" in 2015
15 Transwomen of color have been murdered since 1/1/2017
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1