LogFAQs > #888050445

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tinder researchers have scientifically proven Chad is real
Dustin1280 10/08/17 4:21:47 PM #82:	scar the 1 posted... On that, I disagree. The experiment shows a way to apply socio-economic metrics to a Tinder population. He additionally proposes a metric to measure how attractive you seem to other Tinder users. Just because he does a fitting with a poor sample doesn't mean the metric itself is worthless. This is partly my point; people tunnel so hard on SAMPLE SIZES that they discredit way more than they actually account for. The sample size was plenty to discredit this persons attempt though, especially with the statement he made. Do you agree that the statement that I have posted numerous times is actually accurate? Or do you think it's bullshit based on personal bias? If he plans to make such a MASSIVE statement generalizing the entire population of tinder, don't you think needing a larger sample size would be one of the many requirements to do so? EDIT: Sidenote: TC stated "Tinder researchers have scientifically proven Chad is real" and no they haven't. Not based on that article anyway... --- RIP: Canuklehead, Karma: 1369 // RIP: Gen_Lee_Enfield, Karma: 1731 // RIP: Orlando of the Axe, Karma: 1642 --They delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:888050445] in Tinder res... [t:75856396]...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>On that, I disagree. The experiment shows a way to apply socio-economic metrics to a Tinder population. He additionally proposes a metric to measure how attractive you seem to other Tinder users. Just because he does a fitting with a poor sample doesn't mean the metric itself is worthless. This is partly my point; people tunnel so hard on SAMPLE SIZES that they discredit way more than they actually account for.</quote> The sample size was plenty to discredit this persons attempt though, especially with the statement he made. Do you agree that the statement that I have posted numerous times is actually accurate? Or do you think it's bullshit based on personal bias? If he plans to make such a MASSIVE statement generalizing the entire population of tinder, don't you think needing a larger sample size would be one of the many requirements to do so? EDIT: Sidenote: TC stated "Tinder researchers have scientifically proven Chad is real" and no they haven't. Not based on that article anyway... --- RIP: Canuklehead, Karma: 1369 // RIP: Gen_Lee_Enfield, Karma: 1731 // RIP: Orlando of the Axe, Karma: 1642 --They delivered!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1