LogFAQs > #888038784

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tinder researchers have scientifically proven Chad is real
COVxy 10/08/17 1:12:17 PM #57:	Dustin1280 posted... Callixtus posted... GFaceKillah1280 posted... Uh maybe I'm completely missing something, but I don't see any data justifying his 80/20 claim, or what "attractiveness" means or how it was measured. Coupled with the highly non-representative sample, the "study" is basically worthless. COVxy says otherwise Yeah I wonder if @COVxy is incel I have no opinion on the claim itself, just the meaningless dismissal based on sample size that has no empirical merit. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:888038784] in Tinder res... [t:75856396]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Callixtus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GFaceKillah1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Uh maybe I'm completely missing something, but I don't see any data justifying his 80/20 claim, or what "attractiveness" means or how it was measured. Coupled with the highly non-representative sample, the "study" is basically worthless.</quote> COVxy says otherwise</quote> Yeah I wonder if @COVxy is incel</quote> I have no opinion on the claim itself, just the meaningless dismissal based on sample size that has no empirical merit. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1