LogFAQs > #887783635

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHonestly, how could Hilary have been worst?
1337toothbrush
10/04/17 7:13:37 AM
#38:


Polycosm posted...
1337toothbrush posted...
She would've been better in every way except likely for war. Hillary's a huge warmonger and the situation in Syria would be a lot worse with her in charge. Trump has the whole North Korea situation going on, but that's theatrics. Hillary would absolutely have taken action in Syria and it'd end up being another Iraq or Libya.

Trump did take action in Syria. He launched 59 Tomahawk missiles at Syria, seven days into his presidency.

Hillary is a warmonger but it's far from certain whether she would have run up a higher body count abroad.

That was only to shut people up. You'll notice that he didn't do much damage to the airbase and then he stopped right after that. Hillary would've absolutely escalated it. She was talking about no-fly zones and having a more active role in the area. The no-fly zones alone would've crippled the Syrian government. Plus the anti-Russia rhetoric would've likely been followed up to cripple Syria's strongest ally as well. Terrorists would be running Syria by this point under a Hillary presidency.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1