LogFAQs > #887500059

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Spiderman 3 wasn't that bad
Mr Lasastryke 09/29/17 7:43:30 AM #49:	Lopen posted... Sorry. Actually got good regularly I think the first two spider man movies were fairly well received too (and Batman Begins obviously) but the genre still wasn't really a respected thing yet when Spider Man 3 was out. that's true. i think BB, the first two x-men movies and spider-man 2 were all good movies (spider-man 1 was decent imo). maybe the original batman (i mean the burton one, obviously, not the '60s one) was good too - haven't seen that one in so long that i don't think i'm allowed to have an opinion on it. but yeah, the golden age of superhero movies started after spider-man 3, obviously. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:887500059] in Spiderman ... [t:75815781]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>Sorry. Actually got good regularly I think the first two spider man movies were fairly well received too (and Batman Begins obviously) but the genre still wasn't really a respected thing yet when Spider Man 3 was out.</quote> that's true. i think BB, the first two x-men movies and spider-man 2 were all good movies (spider-man 1 was decent imo). maybe the original batman (i mean the burton one, obviously, not the '60s one) was good too - haven't seen that one in so long that i don't think i'm allowed to have an opinion on it. but yeah, the golden age of superhero movies started after spider-man 3, obviously. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1