There is a big leap from using organs or skin to save someone else's life, and people eatting people.
I think your trolling now with trying to pass off cannibalism as acceptable.
no big leap at all
you think it is fine to use the dead to save lives
people die by hunger do they not?
so why are you opposed to turning the dead into a renewable foodsource?
PROTIP
people who make a good argument YOU cannot logical answer is not trolling
I know people on here immediately see a powerful argument that destroys their position and immediately go
OMG TROLLING I CAN'T BE WRONG
but you shouldn't do that as it makes you look like the real troll
btw, the organs were harvested for research purposes
you might argue it could potentially lead to a breakthrough that maybe could save lives
but I think people are getting the wrong impression
they weren't taking baby hearts to transplant from what I understand
the issue with hunger has more to do with distribution than the amount of food
the amount of food that gets produced now is enough for everyone in the world to have enough. with adequate distribution, your point would become irrelevant
But the distribution is not adequate at this time. Perhaps as we try to work towards organizing food distribution more efficiently, we encourage starving people to eat their dead family members? They are just sacks of meat after all. ---
Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."