LogFAQs > #887408499

Zeeak4444 posted...

@Keith_Valentine posted...

Zeeak4444 posted...

@Keith_Valentine

Yeah, no one is looking for your seal of approval. Not sure why you think anyone would be.

If you can't tell that you self admitting you have no knowledge of Canadas border protections discredits you (especially since you brought it up in the first place) I see no reason to entertain this "discussion" any further.

Yea, try and scurry off.

You're getting off-topic because you have nothing to stand on. Do you even remember my original point? Go look again.

Name 1 reason having the wall for security and to enforce our laws is bad.

You said 'fiscal irresponsibility'. That's barely even an answer, and it's wrong. A wall is a worthy investment. What else ya got?

Proof? Source? You asserted your claim so back it up now.

I provided other options that are more fiscally responsible and your defense was "I don't know anything about it so let me throw out a fallacy about the sensors triggering 500 times".

Back up your claim now. Let's see it.

Ok. Your solution is sensors, like Canada. And we send out patrols when they get triggered. Right? That's your answer. You think that's solid? How many patrols do you suppose that would be a day, on our Mexican border?

What do we do when we catch em. Take em to jail temporarily. How much does that cost? When does that stop? See why I'm saying. Your 'solution' is reactive and short term. Mine is proactive, stop them from ever getting here. Get rekt

We already have technology like sensors. We already have patrols. You know how much that shit costs, constant patrols? Also, with that route, they are already in your country. So you're starting off bad.

I am not convinced at all. Your plan will probaby end up costing more long term than a one time wall. You never address the issue . What else ya got?

Tbh I at least give you props for even admitting some form of border control is needed. Many people call that "racist" right off the bat. Stupid