LogFAQs > #887061015

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why did they take out Iraq for WMDs but never went after N Korea?
Sativa_Rose 09/22/17 1:33:42 AM #3:	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century The Republicans running the show back then all thought they could spread democracy throughout the Middle East, replacing regimes that were unfriendly to the US and its interests with those that were. This extended far beyond just Iraq, but Iraq was supposed to be the beginning. And as for why the Middle East matters and not North Korea, obviously that's for the oil. The fucked it up so badly the plan fell flat on its face. Oh and if I didn't make it clear, there was a plan to go into Iraq long before talk of WMDs was in the picture. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:887061015] in Why did th... [t:75801196]...</cite> <quote>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century The Republicans running the show back then all thought they could spread democracy throughout the Middle East, replacing regimes that were unfriendly to the US and its interests with those that were. This extended far beyond just Iraq, but Iraq was supposed to be the beginning. And as for why the Middle East matters and not North Korea, obviously that's for the oil. The fucked it up so badly the plan fell flat on its face. Oh and if I didn't make it clear, there was a plan to go into Iraq long before talk of WMDs was in the picture. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1