LogFAQs > #977101802

ultra_magnus13 posted...

My understanding is that this case is in regards to if rights can be stripped from people ACCUSED of domestic violence that have a restraining order placed on them.

Correct, but as it's laid out in the article (if you had bothered to read it):

Wright also maintained that those accused of domestic violence have few protections in court prior to being slapped with a ban on guns.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wasn't buying that, noting that Rahimi's ex-girlfriend "did submit a sworn affidavit giving quite a lot of detail about the various threats. It's not like he just showed up and the judge said 'credible finding of violence.'"

They don't just hand out restraining orders for kicks. The person requesting an order needs to provide evidence as to why they're seeking an order.

This challenge was looking to put guns in the hands of a very credibly accused domestic abuser.

Ergo, the only ignorance you'll find in the topic title is my spelling mistake