LogFAQs > #976999832

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Marvel reportedly already considered dropping Kang prior to Major's legal issues
VFalcone 11/02/23 6:25:35 PM #144:	lolife67 posted... You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness. My overall point was that people aren't going to buy tickets to see a movie about characters they don't know or care about even if it gets 98% Rotten Tomatoes, so the movies fail automatically. With DC, they burned the public so badly that every movie is destined to fail no matter who's in it <cite>VFalcone posted [p:976999832] in Marvel rep... [t:80608567]...</cite> <quote>lolife67 posted... </cite><quote>You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness.</quote>My overall point was that people aren't going to buy tickets to see a movie about characters they don't know or care about even if it gets 98% Rotten Tomatoes, so the movies fail automatically. With DC, they burned the public so badly that every movie is destined to fail no matter who's in it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1