LogFAQs > #976999784

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Marvel reportedly already considered dropping Kang prior to Major's legal issues
lolife67 11/02/23 6:22:50 PM #142:	VFalcone posted... DC is a special case though because their movies were just straight bad. Their goodwill was burned after their third movie lol. DCEU had Man of Steel and Wonder Woman that both did well. Then BvS came out, then JL... and it was a wrap. DCEU died before it could start because the movies were too bad and the public won't forgive that. You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness. <cite>lolife67 posted [p:976999784] in Marvel rep... [t:80608567]...</cite> <quote>VFalcone posted... </cite><quote>DC is a special case though because their movies were just straight bad. Their goodwill was burned after their third movie lol. DCEU had Man of Steel and Wonder Woman that both did well. Then BvS came out, then JL... and it was a wrap. DCEU died before it could start because the movies were too bad and the public won't forgive that.</quote>You're proving my point. Having A listers are irrelevant if your movie is bad. Just like having unknown characters doesn't matter if the movie is good. Quality is the main factor, not character awareness.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1