LogFAQs > #976998729

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Marvel reportedly already considered dropping Kang prior to Major's legal issues
lolife67 11/02/23 5:16:36 PM #137:	superbot400 posted... Its funny when you think about it. Because nobody would believe that Marvel was going to surivive with the Iron Man movie back 2008. They were practically bankrupt back then. Yet people are dooming about Marvel more then they are now. Yup lol they're a victim of their own success unfortunately. They made it look so easy for so long that people took it for granted. Even after so many other studios tried (and failed) to launch their own cinematic universes. It's telling that they only appear to be "dying" in comparison to their past successes. If you actually look at the movie studio landscape, Marvel Studios is still doing very well. <cite>lolife67 posted [p:976998729] in Marvel rep... [t:80608567]...</cite> <quote>superbot400 posted... </cite><quote>Its funny when you think about it. Because nobody would believe that Marvel was going to surivive with the Iron Man movie back 2008. They were practically bankrupt back then.Yet people are dooming about Marvel more then they are now.</quote>Yup lol they're a victim of their own success unfortunately. They made it look so easy for so long that people took it for granted. Even after so many other studios tried (and failed) to launch their own cinematic universes. It's telling that they only appear to be "dying" in comparison to their past successes. If you actually look at the movie studio landscape, Marvel Studios is still doing very well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1