LogFAQs > #976998559

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Marvel reportedly already considered dropping Kang prior to Major's legal issues
DarkBuster22904 11/02/23 5:06:50 PM #132:	I'll be honest, I never felt like Kang was a good successor to Thanos as an arc villain. Maybe it's just a basic-bitch opinion, but Kang doesn't have the widespread recognition or staying power that thanos did, and that's something an arc villain should have. Plenty of people, even non-comic fans, could at least vaguely recognize thanos if you showed a picture of him, even before the MCU. Kang though, we have MCU loyalists who couldn't pick the character out of a police lineup. Face it, in terms of Big bads, he's a C-lister, no matter how powerful he is. He's cool to the Comic reading faithful, and basically nobody else. Doom or Galactus would have been far more palatable arc villains if they wanted to keep the ball rolling after Thanos. --- Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006 <cite>DarkBuster22904 posted [p:976998559] in Marvel rep... [t:80608567]...</cite> <quote>I'll be honest, I never felt like Kang was a good successor to Thanos as an arc villain.Maybe it's just a basic-bitch opinion, but Kang doesn't have the widespread recognition or staying power that thanos did, and that's something an arc villain should have. Plenty of people, even non-comic fans, could at least vaguely recognize thanos if you showed a picture of him, even before the MCU. Kang though, we have MCU loyalists who couldn't pick the character out of a police lineup. Face it, in terms of Big bads, he's a C-lister, no matter how powerful he is. He's cool to the Comic reading faithful, and basically nobody else.Doom or Galactus would have been far more palatable arc villains if they wanted to keep the ball rolling after Thanos. --- Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1