LogFAQs > #976875516

ZaruenKosai posted...

Firstly, we are not politcal or military experts, it is not really our job to come up with a proper solution.

You just think you're better at it than the experts because you don't like the solutions the experts come up with.

Though there have ben some suggestions

As pointed out, every suggestion you come up with is intended to result in arming Hamas. Sure, you say Hamas "needs to be dealt with" but you're intentionally setting up a situation where they're replaced with the same thing under a different name.

ZaruenKosai posted...

The best solution I have, is a 2 state solution with a 3rd party acting as an intermediary to assist in building trust relations between Israel and Palestine and preventing or squashing any clashes between the two, and it would have to be a neutral party, not one with cater towards either Israel or Palestine.

I am sure the world leaders can come up with something better though, considering it is their area of expertise.

Your best solution is something you know one side will never accept? Or are you so ignorant that you think they will accept it if rammed down their throats hard enough?

Thankfully the experts know better.

If the results of this conflict ends with over 100k + Palestinians Dead and 200k+ Wounded

The preceding 80 years of Palestinian conflicts haven't had half that many casualties, and that includes conflicts Israel wasn't even involved in. You're just highlighting how woefully unqualified you are to have an opinion on this topic.

ZaruenKosai posted...

I will re-iterate of course Hamas must be dealt with

You keep saying this but then rule out taking any action to actually do it. I can't possibly imagine why you'd be against any action taken against terrorists.