LogFAQs > #976572719

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAlabama police give homeowner one second to respond before killing him
Dark_Arbron
10/09/23 11:27:04 PM
#134:


pnut027 posted...
You grossly underestimate what professionals do. I can just imagine some weirdo jacking it to a woman in the bathroom.

Oh, for sure. I also think such behavior would be pretty pathetic. I'm just annoyed at the mindset I was describing because I've also seen people hesitant to show their own doctor their genitals because "eww, another man is seeing my dick!" And don't even think of telling them a colonoscopy may be in order...

It probably seemed like a weird tangent I went off on. Because it was.

So we can revert to my previous point then. The camera has to be remotely disabled and a report of the request filed. Bathroom privacy, fine. What I said is just my opinion. Regardless of what I think, privacy can be accounted for. There are probably other scenarios where having the cameras off is justified too. But the ability to turn them off at will without even being asked why is a problem, I think we'll agree.

---
"The US is not a single country. It is ~20 developed countries being held hostage by ~25 developing countries and ~5 failed states." -Calintares
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1