So am I reading this wrong or are people's reading comprehension here just this bad? It doesn't say Valve had any objections with the content ingame other than the lack of a combat level. It said right in the post that "according to Valve, [the content] is not sufficiently explicit to be considered a sexual assault reference [in the label]".
So Valve's issue is with the warning label being inaccurate to them. There's nothing about the content being a problem. It seems like everyone just kneejerked to the mention of sexual assault and immediately assumed the problem was with the sexual assault itself (which Valve apparently doesn't even consider it as)
THIS
---
3 things 1. i am female 2. i havea msucle probelm its hard for me to typ well 3.*does her janpuu dance*