LogFAQs > #976366772

Gladius_ posted...

Doesn't help that there's a plethora of bad advice in the red pill community coming from people who don't have a clue in what women want that have no problem presenting misinformation about what we want.

The red pill is telling men that they need to get out approaching women no matter what, because even if they don't have a good grasp on what women want and are likely to fail they'll at least gain experience and become more comfortable doing so.

The anti-red pill tells men to be considerate of women's feelings and desires and whatnot while pursuing them. Which is cool for men who can manage it, but beyond the capabilities of guys with poor social skills. So the latter group just ends up not approaching, because that's the only way to guarantee they don't make women uncomfortable. This group becomes too sensitive to how women respond to them.

Problem is most men can't get away with the latter behavior because men are still mostly expected to approach. So the red pill mentality, despite risking toxic behavior, still provides a performance boost over the more gentle anti-red pill approach if the man is too shy/awkward to pull the latter off.

Gladius_ posted...

You are unfamiliar with the user then and his new gimmick argument. His argument has been that approaching women is a waste because the future is online dating and that success via approaching women is impossible but that dating online is also rigged because while it's your best bet women only care about the top 1%.

He is desperate to prove approaching doesn't work so that he can then in turn prove online dating only works for a certain subset of people and therefore by proxy most guys no matter how hard they try are doomed and undesirable.

He's an incel.

Interesting. That level of roundabout scheming is above my pay grade but I guess it's possible.