LogFAQs > #976327146

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Reminder that judicial appointments is reason enough to vote Blue
HairyQueen 09/26/23 10:28:24 PM #3:	ClayGuida posted... This is true. However judicial matters outside of major ones, rarely have a direct affect on the standard citizen. Obviously something like Roe being overturned did, but the amount of small cases they cover literally doesn't even make the news. It's when they remove big shit like AA or the like. What I'm getting at, is it's hard to tell a non voter, or a sometimes voter, to only care about the judiciary when a majority have absolutely no clue what they do, because they don't see that actual consequences of their decisions 99% of the time. I would never tell someone to only care about judicial appointments. --- "Every last inch of me's covered in hair!" <cite>HairyQueen posted [p:976327146] in Reminder t... [t:80578243]...</cite> <quote>ClayGuida posted... </cite><quote>This is true. However judicial matters outside of major ones, rarely have a direct affect on the standard citizen. Obviously something like Roe being overturned did, but the amount of small cases they cover literally doesn't even make the news. It's when they remove big shit like AA or the like. What I'm getting at, is it's hard to tell a non voter, or a sometimes voter, to only care about the judiciary when a majority have absolutely no clue what they do, because they don't see that actual consequences of their decisions 99% of the time.</quote>I would never tell someone to only care about judicial appointments. --- "Every last inch of me's covered in hair!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1