LogFAQs > #976229262

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Family of man who died driving off collapsed bridge sues google for its map app
Kloe_Rinz 09/21/23 11:14:01 PM #27:	Charismic_Zach_Gowen posted... Except it was at night, probably in near pitch black setting given the town couldn't even put up barricades. By the time the guy saw it, he probably couldn't stop in time. Google is absolutely partly at fault here. They advertise safe navigation and had plenty of time to update their maps. The town has the majority of fault clearly, but that doesn't absolve google from ensuring their maps are updated in a reasonable fashion I honestly cant see Google at fault. They always say to pay attention to signage etc, of which there was none. What if someone else who wasnt using Google maps tried to take that road? This is 100% the councils fault and Id go as far as personally blaming whoever rejected barricades/closing the roads and charging them with deadly negligence <cite>Kloe_Rinz posted [p:976229262] in Family of ... [t:80573614]...</cite> <quote>Charismic_Zach_Gowen posted... </cite><quote>Except it was at night, probably in near pitch black setting given the town couldn't even put up barricades. By the time the guy saw it, he probably couldn't stop in time. Google is absolutely partly at fault here. They advertise safe navigation and had plenty of time to update their maps. The town has the majority of fault clearly, but that doesn't absolve google from ensuring their maps are updated in a reasonable fashion</quote>I honestly cant see Google at fault. They always say to pay attention to signage etc, of which there was none. What if someone else who wasnt using Google maps tried to take that road? This is 100% the councils fault and Id go as far as personally blaming whoever rejected barricades/closing the roads and charging them with deadly negligence </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1