LogFAQs > #975754512

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Starfield looks bad
Axiom 08/30/23 2:28:01 PM #120:	Heineken14 posted... It seems like it'd be more for a lighter space exploration/combat with heavier ground based exploration/combat. Elite Dangerous does not have that (I don't believe, been awhile since I've even looked at that) and No Man's Sky has it, but their ground combat is atrocious. No clue about Stellaris. Stellaris isn't really comparable as it's a 4x strategy and also much better than the other two and probably even Starfield. Elite Dangerous is just a straight up garbo sim with completely imcompetent devs. NMS has come a long way but even with all the additions is still so boring <cite>Axiom posted [p:975754512] in Starfield ... [t:80550428]...</cite> <quote>Heineken14 posted... </cite><quote>It seems like it'd be more for a lighter space exploration/combat with heavier ground based exploration/combat. Elite Dangerous does not have that (I don't believe, been awhile since I've even looked at that) and No Man's Sky has it, but their ground combat is atrocious. No clue about Stellaris.</quote>Stellaris isn't really comparable as it's a 4x strategy and also much better than the other two and probably even Starfield. Elite Dangerous is just a straight up garbo sim with completely imcompetent devs. NMS has come a long way but even with all the additions is still so boring</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1