LogFAQs > #975545885

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	self-checkout is proven actually slower than human checkout
Ivany2008 08/19/23 5:57:15 PM #228:	Tyranthraxus posted... Uh even when I did cashier work in the early 90s there's was a rolling catalog alphabetized with every item and the code. It took like 2 seconds to spin the tube to find the item. Only weird cases was for items that didn't have a code and had to get rung up as "deli" or something like that. I was more or less making the case that self checkouts and regular checkouts use 2 different softwares. Self checkouts make finding foreign items a lot easier, if you know the name. Whereas in the rolodex it could be one of several different names. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:975545885] in self-check... [t:80541072]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>Uh even when I did cashier work in the early 90s there's was a rolling catalog alphabetized with every item and the code. It took like 2 seconds to spin the tube to find the item. Only weird cases was for items that didn't have a code and had to get rung up as "deli" or something like that.</quote>I was more or less making the case that self checkouts and regular checkouts use 2 different softwares. Self checkouts make finding foreign items a lot easier, if you know the name. Whereas in the rolodex it could be one of several different names.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1