LogFAQs > #975521508

g980 posted...

how far can this topic go before anyone talks about the actual arguments in this case i wonder

Article didn't give us any, just "holy shit! panic!" and mention of a case from a decade ago that SCOTUS declined.

This is the best I got, after digging around:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-1095.html

Washington Examiner came through with an actual link to the actual case.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/supreme-court-asked-nyc-rent-control-violates-takings-clause

This looks like the actual "meat" of the case:

The appeals court also disagreed that rent increase limits create a regulatory taking, a theory that was floated in a dissent by justices Antonin Scalia and Sandra Day O'Connor from the 1988 decision in Pennell v. City of San Jose, arguing that notion had never been adopted by a majority of the court.