LogFAQs > #975450210

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI didnt know Ted Nugent was a FNAF fan O_O
Guns_of_Verdun
08/14/23 4:52:36 PM
#34:


I4NRulez posted...
Wrong, I read a goosebump book with my little brother this summer for a summer library reading competition for his school.

And I shouldn't have to read a companion book to judge the lore. Halo has good lore and ive never read any of the halo books which I've heard are good. I judge FNAF by the lore in games because that's its main medium. Same way i wouldn't judge goosebumps any differently if they released a shitty video game.

Its not about liking something more from my childhood. I'm not looking at something with nostalgia glasses. I liked space jam as a kid and when I watch it as an adult I can see its an awful movie objectively. I still love it.

FNAF has awful lore and more bad games than good. Its not the next big teen horror franchise. Yeah, its more succesful than people thought it would be and im glad because the first 2 games are good and it deserves it.

FNAF just has some of the worst storytelling and lore in video games. Its objectively bad. Even when i watch FNAF friendly youtubers play the games they say its bad. The only people i see who say its good are FNAF hardcore fans who will defend it from anything.

Right off the bat, Goosebumps had Lore companion books as well. I had one as a kid and another got released with the movie.

I like how you cut out the part about you not actually reading a single FNAF book as well as how "I prefer Goosebumps so therefore you can't compare them" doesn't mean anything.

Hell even "Well I watched a video and the guy in the video said the thing was bad" is weird.

Also what does "It's objectively bad" mean?

It's opinion. There's no such thing as an obective opinion. Meanwhile the only non opinion metric is sales and critical reception. Which FNAF does well in.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with prefering the thing you grew up with as a kid, that's natural. You can love Goosebumps and hate FNAF until the cows come home, but why are you claiming that you can't compare a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise with a quirky multi-media child friendly horror franchise? Solely because you like one more than the other?

FNAF is very much a modern day goosebumps regardless of your opinion on either property. It's just the next generations version of the same thing.

And in 20 years time someone like you is going to be claiming that you can't compare FNAF to Captain Tim's Spooky Town because FNAF is so much better.

---
http://i.imgur.com/VwJsmAR.gifv
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1