LogFAQs > #975254165

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	why do you guys think streaming services aren't transparent
Zithers 08/04/23 6:11:53 PM #36:	RuneterranSnap posted... I do, as much or better than you do most likely. I also know original movies are still coming out constantly and comic book movies haven't changed that. the major studios are releasing less movies than ever tho. their whole business model is make bigger more expensive movies that are super long and soak up every showing in a theater. movies did not used to always be 140+ minutes and cost over $200m. StealThisSheen posted... I don't have to address shit. You're the one that made the claim, it's on you to prove it. This is typical troll shit. "I'm going to make a claim, and you have to prove it wrong, instead of me proving it right!" Fuck off with that. did you not see the snippet from the new yorker article where streaming execs tell people to make their movies/shows less engaging because the goal is to be "a second screen"? Ferroseed posted... what??? licensed and historical films have always been a thing. theyre not doing anything different at all. what the hell are you on about? StealThisSheen posted... Oh, I somehow missed that Zithers's examples of "different" films are... Barbie and Oppenheimer. Wow. They really are a troll, huh? when is the last time a historical drama made $80m in its opening weekend? i'll give a hint: oh wait this has never happened. what is the last film similar to barbie to come out? a studio comedy that is unashamedly pink and girly and artificial. sure, its based on IP - but do you ever look at, like, the aesthetics of visual arts rather than just whether or not something is IP? you would make a good (read: bad) studio exec! --- http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02lct2g9l1qdlvg6o1_500.gif https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1283-quality-cinema-club <cite>Zithers posted [p:975254165] in why do you... [t:80527808]...</cite> <quote>RuneterranSnap posted... </cite><quote>I do, as much or better than you do most likely.I also know original movies are still coming out constantly and comic book movies haven't changed that.</quote>the major studios are releasing less movies than ever tho. their whole business model is make bigger more expensive movies that are super long and soak up every showing in a theater. movies did not used to always be 140+ minutes and cost over $200m.StealThisSheen posted... </cite><quote>I don't have to address shit. You're the one that made the claim, it's on you to prove it. This is typical troll shit. "I'm going to make a claim, and you have to prove it wrong, instead of me proving it right!"Fuck off with that.</quote>did you not see the snippet from the new yorker article where streaming execs tell people to make their movies/shows less engaging because the goal is to be "a second screen"?Ferroseed posted... </cite><quote>what??? licensed and historical films have always been a thing. theyre not doing anything different at all. what the hell are you on about?</quote>StealThisSheen posted... </cite><quote>Oh, I somehow missed that Zithers's examples of "different" films are... Barbie and Oppenheimer. Wow. They really are a troll, huh?</quote>when is the last time a historical drama made $80m in its opening weekend? i'll give a hint: oh wait this has never happened. what is the last film similar to barbie to come out? a studio comedy that is unashamedly pink and girly and artificial. sure, its based on IP - but do you ever look at, like, the aesthetics of visual arts rather than just whether or not something is IP? you would make a good (read: bad) studio exec! --- http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02lct2g9l1qdlvg6o1_500.gifhttps://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1283-quality-cinema-club</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1