LogFAQs > #974913458

TMOG posted...

You expected something called a Pixel Remaster to not use pixelated graphics?

No?

the non pixel remasters look much more modernized and hd, that's why pixel remasters are not worth playing to me.

I was simply answering the Topic Question and giving my reasoning as to why.

Will_VIIII posted...

Pixel remasters are the way to go due to the qol updates and 16:9 aspect ratio for modern platforms.

The extra content in the PSP and GBA versions aren't worth playing an objectively inferior version of the game except for maybe 4 since the PSP version has The Interlude and The After Years which you could simply play after 4

Hard Disagree

I love everything about the NON-Pixel remasters.

The graphics are updated to hd, textures and backgrounds, (in some of the remasters)
New content is added, sometimes bestiaries, music player, etc.
QOL Features almost always added.

if anything the very originals are the best with all the mods\randomizers etc\ but some of the remasters also have access to that stuff , but pixel remasters dont have any of that except for a few of the most basic QoL features.

the ability to upscale the graphics internally\use filters to make them look better, and access to special modded versions of each game such as randomziers and other stuff for each game is only available on the originals and in some of the remasters.

none of the pixel remasters have the abundance of mods and randomizers that the older versions have. that alone makes the pixel remasters the worst ones

zzzz boring.