LogFAQs > #974871820

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do any of you believe that with the MS , activision acquisition going through
ConfusedTorchic 07/16/23 11:11:03 AM #18:	adjl posted... What is it about this subject that's made you incapable of discussing it without resorting immediately to strawman statements? my guy what are you talking about adjl posted... By insisting that making Sony unable to rely on CoD was a good thing for the market. Whatever "other platforms" get CoD (noting that your "other platforms" diagram just includes Nintendo's and a bunch of minor PC services nobody cares about), removing it from Sony's would be a massive reduction in the number of people who want to play CoD and currently can (particularly where so many people have already made their console buying decisions based on that). However many "other platforms" get the game, when such a large platform with so many people loses it, that's making it less available. this is straight up what you have tried to claim, because you're under the wack ass assumption that call of duty is going to be removed from playstation it's not. like legally, it cannot now without opening themselves up to being sued since it was stated under oath. if there is no call of duty on the eventual Playstation 6, then that is playstations fault, since Jim Ryan has already stated that he would not be letting them have dev kits. it's so wild to see adj bootlicking sony lmao --- "It's not the harm to Sony we care about. " - US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to the FTC. <cite>ConfusedTorchic posted [p:974871820] in Do any of ... [t:80509290]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite><quote>What is it about this subject that's made you incapable of discussing it without resorting immediately to strawman statements?</quote>my guy what are you talking about<quote>adjl posted... By insisting that making Sony unable to rely on CoD was a good thing for the market. Whatever "other platforms" get CoD (noting that your "other platforms" diagram just includes Nintendo's and a bunch of minor PC services nobody cares about), removing it from Sony's would be a massive reduction in the number of people who want to play CoD and currently can (particularly where so many people have already made their console buying decisions based on that). However many "other platforms" get the game, when such a large platform with so many people loses it, that's making it less available.</quote>this is straight up what you have tried to claim, because you're under the wack ass assumption that call of duty is going to be removed from playstationit's not. like legally, it cannot now without opening themselves up to being sued since it was stated under oath.if there is no call of duty on the eventual Playstation 6, then that is playstations fault, since Jim Ryan has already stated that he would not be letting them have dev kits.it's so wild to see adj bootlicking sony lmao --- "It's not the harm to Sony we care about. " - US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to the FTC.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1