LogFAQs > #974543242

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SC decision allows discrimination against LGBTQ+ with illegitimate case
uwnim 06/30/23 10:35:29 PM #97:	Gwynevere posted... I'm in full agreement that Colorado should say "noted" and enforce their law anyway. The Supreme Court has no means to actually enforce any of their decisions. It's all based on good faith, and if they show no good faith then why should anyone else? I don't. But I live in Florida where the threat of losing free speech is pointed my way and not towards conservatives. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:974543242] in SC decisio... [t:80495235]...</cite> <quote>Gwynevere posted... </cite><quote>I'm in full agreement that Colorado should say "noted" and enforce their law anyway. The Supreme Court has no means to actually enforce any of their decisions. It's all based on good faith, and if they show no good faith then why should anyone else?</quote>I don't. But I live in Florida where the threat of losing free speech is pointed my way and not towards conservatives. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn.[Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1