LogFAQs > #974044171

I think this is one of those situations where I can comprehend both sides. That being said, I end up leaning to the side that thinks someone wanting to be a 'public defender' should actually be required to do so. While I don't think the penultimate solution is for there to always be a 'good guy' to gun down the 'bad guy', cops that don't get into action are embarrassing.

The Uvalde shooting happened May 24, 2022. Where I live, where we don't see much gun violence, this happened a month later:
https://globalnews.ca/news/9424658/saanich-bank-shooting/

The cops formulated a quick plan, leapt into action, eliminated the threat, sustained major injuries, but nobody died except the two idiots that held up the bank with semi-automatics and body armour.

It's so sad that we've seen so many events like these that we can literally make a T-chart of whether or not the police response was effective or totally fucking useless.

So I don't really advocate harsh punishment, but maybe 6 months to a couple of years? It'd be good to have a positive restitution-type environment where that dude can consider if he should even be a resource officer.