LogFAQs > #973410271

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I'm seeing some people say the PT is now good in Star Wars
DarkBuster22904 05/11/23 5:15:09 PM #57:	David1988 posted... The time from PT to OT feels like hundreds if not thousand of years apart in timeline, is it really only 20 years? I guess Lukes age is a good indicator how long its been since Vader turned. but damn it feels like one happened multiple lifetimes after the other. a bit less, actually. Luke in 19 in ANH. Which means ST Luke is only in his 40s. Clearly had some of that Old Ben aging. --- Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006 <cite>DarkBuster22904 posted [p:973410271] in I'm seeing... [t:80439935]...</cite> <quote>David1988 posted... </cite><quote>The time from PT to OT feels like hundreds if not thousand of years apart in timeline, is it really only 20 years? I guess Lukes age is a good indicator how long its been since Vader turned. but damn it feels like one happened multiple lifetimes after the other.</quote>a bit less, actually. Luke in 19 in ANH.Which means ST Luke is only in his 40s. Clearly had some of that Old Ben aging. --- Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1