LogFAQs > #972968756

The way I look at it is that in scientific research framing things unequivocally as either successes or failures is often not the most reasonable framing. However that's exactly the framing that public relations asks that you provide, which results in weird posturing like this that makes no sense.

Some aspects were executed successfully and some were not, and the goal of the test is to figure out which ones are not successful and why.

Of course I'd rather they just say something like "the rocket successfully achieved liftoff but then exploded which isn't great, but now we have more information to help us address the problem in the next version", but yeah.