LogFAQs > #972871099

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Conservative Dude creates 'Anti-Woke' Beer
SKARDAVNELNATE 04/15/23 11:48:19 PM #122:	ConfusedTorchic posted... no one is marketing this to children, full stop. That is the interpretation I have heard in discussions around this subject. ConfusedTorchic posted... provide proof of this beer being marketed to children or shut the fuck up about it and accept that you're wrong. If the VPs own words don't persuade you I don't know what will. I don't have access to Dylan Mulvaney's viewer demographics. And thus far neither does anyone arguing that it isn't largely under the legal age for buying alcohol. ConfusedTorchic posted... we've established that their target demographic is frat houses, while their actual demographic males in their mid 30's. You said that who is buying the beer doesn't matter. The demographic they're targeting is what matters. The mid 30s demographic doesn't fit with the "fratty" image. You're intentionally ignoring part of the information to make your argument. adjl posted... The existence of a boycott is not evidence that your understanding of why the boycott is happening is correct. My understanding of why the boycott is happening in consistent with discussions I've seen surrounding the boycott. adjl posted... The first post in the topic unambiguously proves that the outrage is rooted in transphobia ("doesn't know which bathroom to use" is overtly transphobic rhetoric, as anyone with a modicum of understanding of the situation can tell you) Wrong, they are using trans issues as a marketing gimmick but that does not mean the boycott is over trans issues any more than it means the boycott is about introduce a competing beer. Nor is the mention of bathrooms transphobia. One group thinks bathrooms are for a biological function. Another group thinks bathrooms are divided along social behaviors. It's a different perspective. Having a different perspective from someone is not a form of bigotry. LinkPizza posted... From what Ive seen, no one is boycotting the alcohol because they think its selling to kids. From what I've seen, that is what they think. adjl posted... He's pretty unambiguously demonstrated that he only believed that because he misunderstood the marketing strategy. I acknowledged that another interpretation was possible. I pointed out how your interpretation didn't connect with all of the information available. I am still under the impression that my interpretation is correct. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:972871099] in Conservati... [t:80412178]...</cite> <quote>ConfusedTorchic posted... </cite><quote>no one is marketing this to children, full stop.</quote>That is the interpretation I have heard in discussions around this subject.ConfusedTorchic posted... </cite><quote>provide proof of this beer being marketed to children or shut the fuck up about it and accept that you're wrong.</quote>If the VPs own words don't persuade you I don't know what will. I don't have access to Dylan Mulvaney's viewer demographics. And thus far neither does anyone arguing that it isn't largely under the legal age for buying alcohol.ConfusedTorchic posted... </cite><quote>we've established that their target demographic is frat houses, while their actual demographic males in their mid 30's.</quote>You said that who is buying the beer doesn't matter. The demographic they're targeting is what matters. The mid 30s demographic doesn't fit with the "fratty" image. You're intentionally ignoring part of the information to make your argument.adjl posted... </cite><quote>The existence of a boycott is not evidence that your understanding of why the boycott is happening is correct.</quote>My understanding of why the boycott is happening in consistent with discussions I've seen surrounding the boycott.adjl posted... </cite><quote>The first post in the topic unambiguously proves that the outrage is rooted in transphobia ("doesn't know which bathroom to use" is overtly transphobic rhetoric, as anyone with a modicum of understanding of the situation can tell you)</quote>Wrong, they are using trans issues as a marketing gimmick but that does not mean the boycott is over trans issues any more than it means the boycott is about introduce a competing beer. Nor is the mention of bathrooms transphobia. One group thinks bathrooms are for a biological function. Another group thinks bathrooms are divided along social behaviors. It's a different perspective. Having a different perspective from someone is not a form of bigotry.LinkPizza posted... </cite><quote>From what Ive seen, no one is boycotting the alcohol because they think its selling to kids.</quote>From what I've seen, that is what they think.adjl posted... </cite><quote>He's pretty unambiguously demonstrated that he only believed that because he misunderstood the marketing strategy.</quote>I acknowledged that another interpretation was possible. I pointed out how your interpretation didn't connect with all of the information available. I am still under the impression that my interpretation is correct. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1