LogFAQs > #972845514

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Remember when it was against the ToS to downplay or deny genocides?
Anteaterking 04/14/23 5:43:08 PM #72:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] I don't think Lemkin's definition of genocide (which is the basis for the UN definition) supports the idea of a "trans genocide". "National group" is supposed to be a looser stand in for "nation", not to mean a group that is nationally present. I think it's still valid to refer to it as genocide/attempted genocide, I just think you have to appeal to more contemporary definitions. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:972845514] in Remember w... [t:80411966]...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> I don't think Lemkin's definition of genocide (which is the basis for the UN definition) supports the idea of a "trans genocide". "National group" is supposed to be a looser stand in for "nation", not to mean a group that is nationally present.I think it's still valid to refer to it as genocide/attempted genocide, I just think you have to appeal to more contemporary definitions. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpghttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1