LogFAQs > #972313171

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Wyoming governor calls trans athlete ban bill 'draconian' and then passes it
famfam 03/21/23 10:34:27 AM #20:	CyricZ posted... A veto would have been a clear message to the voters that you are against it. If he is not vetoing it, he's not against it, no matter what he says in a letter. These "performative actions" fucking matter when you're a politician elected by the people. The reason he chose no action is as someone already pointed out, plausible deniability come the next election: centrism bullshit. he understands that it matters, and made the best decision for himself. he wants to keep being elected <cite>famfam posted [p:972313171] in Wyoming go... [t:80386195]...</cite> <quote>CyricZ posted... </cite><quote>A veto would have been a clear message to the voters that you are against it.If he is not vetoing it, he's not against it, no matter what he says in a letter.These "performative actions" fucking matter when you're a politician elected by the people.The reason he chose no action is as someone already pointed out, plausible deniability come the next election: centrism bullshit.</quote>he understands that it matters, and made the best decision for himself. he wants to keep being elected</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1