LogFAQs > #972290500

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHow is a card with only three words as its effect competitively broken?
cadcrafter
03/20/23 9:00:07 AM
#12:


Philip027 posted...
IDK, but in what little I've dabbled in of the Pokemon TCG (that is, the Game Boy game), I remember feeling the same way about the Bill trainer card, which does literally the exact same thing as this. Putting 4 Bills into the deck (the max it allows) was practically a given for me.
Its basically this, its because if it was legal theres literally no reason not to put it in your deck. Even a card that only had the effect to draw you one card effortlessly would likely be banned or limited (and i think the closest thing upstart goblin IS limited). It basically means you get to have a 37 card deck instead of a 40 card deck with no downside or complications, which makes your deck more consistent so theres no reason not to run 3 copies of it. And of course the problem is worse since you get 2 cards instead of 1, ESPECIALLY in yugioh which doesn't have a recourse system like pokemon's energy or mtg's mana: that card might be just what you needed to pull off a big combo.
Basically, it would just be an auto include in every deck and make the game much mire explosive and about who goes first which is why its banned

---
"think before you press enter. all of you." - SmashFaqs Discord
i want lemm to eat ten egg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1