LogFAQs > #971746885

vycebrand2 posted...

He put himself in that position where he had to do that, Gobby. It's like if I went to GA(I live in FL) decided to show off my big bad rifle where there is civil unrest and not expect the repcussions of doing so. There is word for Kyle and it would definitely get me banned here.

The gun had nothing to do with him being attacked. People keep making up this headcanon about everything happening in reaction to his gun. It has nothing to do with it. They spent a lot of time on this in the trial. He pissed off an unhinged guy who was threatening people all night, by putting out the trash fires he had started.

All the fault is on Rosenbaum. He had just been in the hospital for a suicide attempt and then went straight to the protest after his discharge and started causing trouble. The doctor probably told him to go home, not downtown.

The equivalent would be if you went somewhere with a gun and tons of other people had guns there and you saw some shit on fire, tried putting it out and then some unhinged guy decided to jump you because he was the one who started the fire.

The curfew thing is also completely irrelevant since nobody was being sent home and they weren't checking ID. The cops were allowing everybody to be there.

Constantly pushing misinformation and irrelevant headcanon makes a lot of you look like huge hypocrites.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

"Insidious intentions" is completely unsupported. They spent a significant amount of time trying to find anything that would support it at the trial, and it all backfired on the prosecution because their own witnesses testified in favor of Rittenhouse. This was not a case of there being insufficient evidence. The evidence and actions directly contradicted it.