LogFAQs > #969380760

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Most useless pokemon gets useless evolution in New games.
StarReaper13 11/12/22 3:19:16 PM #31:	ellis123 posted... Unless every Pokemon is exactly the same there would always be better and worse Pokemon. The idea of "perfect balance" is a myth made by people who have absolutely zero clue about how balance works. That doesn't make it "good" (As Doe said), and every pokemon isn't made the same. Besides stuff like natures and IVs, even Pokemon with similar BSTs can have different types and movesets which changes match ups. Having objectively worse pokemon instead hurts variety for serious, competitive play. --- Ignore when people say that the title length is not important, that a title should just convey what the game is about. They're just jealous theirs isn't as long <cite>StarReaper13 posted [p:969380760] in Most usele... [t:80229955]...</cite> <quote>ellis123 posted... </cite><quote>Unless every Pokemon is exactly the same there would always be better and worse Pokemon. The idea of "perfect balance" is a myth made by people who have absolutely zero clue about how balance works.</quote>That doesn't make it "good" (As Doe said), and every pokemon isn't made the same. Besides stuff like natures and IVs, even Pokemon with similar BSTs can have different types and movesets which changes match ups. Having objectively worse pokemon instead hurts variety for serious, competitive play. --- Ignore when people say that the title length is not important, that a title should just convey what the game is about. They're just jealous theirs isn't as long</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1