LogFAQs > #969036527

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFmr. VPOTUS Mike Pence: Founders never thought about 'freedom from religion'
MachineJaipur
10/28/22 3:02:04 PM
#1:


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t0TUShKydJ4

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/mike-pence-says-constitution-doesnt-guarantee-americans-freedom-religion/

Mike Pence said yesterday on Fox Business that the First Amendment to the Constitution doesnt provide freedom from religion, the idea that people shouldnt have other peoples religious beliefs forced on them.
Host Larry Kudlow told Pence that far-left progressives will not allow God into the conversation, will not allow religion into the conversation. Not just the conversation, the schools, the communities, the workplace I mean, no one is allowed to talk about the Ten Commandments or the importance of moral values.
People are allowed to talk about the Ten Commandments and morality in the U.S.
How can we have a truly great nation? These lefties want to scrap religion, Mike Pence, and I think its a terrible mistake, Kudlow said.
Pence waited a bit possibly to see if Kudlow was actually going to ask a question and responded: Well, the radical left believes that the freedom of religion is the freedom from religion. But its nothing the American founders ever thought of or generations of Americans fought to defend.
The good news is that after four years of the Trump-Pence administration, Im confident that we have a pro-religious freedom majority on the Supreme Court of the United States, he continued.
Despite Pences insistence, the First Amendment comes with two parts. He and Kudlow appeared to be familiar with the Free Exercise Clause, which says Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
But theres also the Establishment Clause, which says that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
In other words, the First Amendment gives people both freedom of and freedom from religion.
Americas founders were opposed to the government forcing religion on people, especially considering the religious oppression and wars that had plagued Europe in the centuries leading up to the writing of the Constitution.
No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities, Thomas Jefferson wrote in the constitution of Virginia, showing that freedom from religion was definitely something that the founders were thinking of.
The settled opinion here is that religion is essentially distinct from Civil Government, and exempt from its cognizance; that a connexion between them is injurious to both; that there are causes in the human breast, which ensure the perpetuity of religion without the aid of the law, James Madison wrote in a letter in 1819. A legal establishment of religion without a toleration could not be thought of, and with toleration, is no security for public quiet and harmony, but rather a source itself of discord and animosity.
Pences views on the establishment of a national religion could be of national importance in a few years. He has suggested that hes considering a 2024 presidential run and, as he noted in the interview with Kudlow, the president can appoint judges who can rule against freedom from religion.

Hey, Pence, go fuck yourself, you slimy git.

Also thanks for saying the quiet part out loud. ACB and Kavanaugh, at the very least, should be removed for possibility of being compromised and lacking the impartiality needed to be SCOTUS judges.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1